3320 operation panel
![3320 operation panel 3320 operation panel](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0UxZcLy_biY/XNaLQZLd2gI/AAAAAAAAAKo/nZUcuXN7J84PAFQq8ZJxtqVd10ifFmAJQCLcBGAs/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/John%2BDeere%2B3120%252C%2B3320%252C%2B3520%252C%2B3720%2BCompact%2BUtility%2BTractor%2BDiagnostic%252C%2BOperation%2Band%2BTest%2BService%2BRepair%2BTechnical%2BManual%2BTM2138.jpeg)
Scans of photos in JPEG format and documents in PDF format looked very true to the originals – sharp overall. The same was true in color and black and white. The banding was more pronounced on photographs or artwork with depth, versus illustrations with a flat appearance. Although the device does not support matte paper, I was pleased with the look of the print I made on to matte paper using the plain paper setting.Ĭopy quality was similar to print quality: Text looked a little rough around the edges, and graphics looked very attractive - but mild banding was distracting on some prints. These prints looked very attractive, with sharp details and natural-looking color saturation. Banding, however, was clearly visible across all of our graphics prints.īecause the TS3320 would not print onto letter-size glossy paper, we were left to judge photo quality on 5-by-7 inch and 4-by-6-inch glossy prints. Graphics printed onto plain paper looked attractive, with sharp details and smooth mid-tone transitions. Letterforms in our PDF test document looked sharper, by comparison. On close examination, letterforms in text documents had soft edges, with errant ink spray around them. Text prints were not extremely sharp, but adequate. It captured a scan in just 7.5 seconds, compared to the average of 11 seconds the TS9120 was similarly fast, at 7.7 seconds. The printer scanned quickly in black-and-white to PDF format at 300 dpi. By comparison, the Editor's Choice Canon TS9120 made the same scan in just 37.8 seconds.
![3320 operation panel 3320 operation panel](https://5.imimg.com/data5/PU/EI/MY-59627620/cummins-deep_sea_control_panel_electronic_dse5510-500x500.jpg)
At 1 minute and 1.7 seconds, it came in under the average of 1 minute and 7.7 seconds. The TS3320 made a 600 dots-per-inch (dpi) color scan to JPEG format at roughly average speed. The Editor's Choice Canon Pixma TS9120 made a color copy in just 17.3 seconds in our tests-almost three times faster than the TS3320.īlack-and-white copying was more within range, but still somewhat slow at 19.2 seconds, compared to the category average of 15.8 seconds. Only the HP Tango X was slower, at 1 minute and 11 seconds. At 47 seconds, it was far behind the average of 27.8 seconds.
![3320 operation panel 3320 operation panel](https://www.kenwood.com/usa/com/lmr/nx-3220_3320/images/image_product01.png)
The TS3320 is the second-slowest inkjet model at color copying we've tested in this category. Copy and scan speedĬolor copying was slow. However, we've seen slower printing, such as the now-discontinued Epson XP-420, which took nearly 3 minutes to complete the same task. Among speedier models were the Canon Pixma MG3620, which printed a 4-by-6 in just 43 seconds, and the HP Tango X, at 1 minute and 15 seconds. By comparison, most models we've tested were faster, though some were slower. The TS3320 made 4-by-6-inch glossy prints in 2 minutes and 1 second.
![3320 operation panel 3320 operation panel](https://docplayer.net/docs-images/99/140442152/images/21-0.jpg)
So, I made 4-by-6-inch photo prints instead, for comparison. The TS3320 was unable to complete our photo printing speed test, for which we make a full-page print onto letter-size photo paper (more on that later). Comparable models printed the same PDF at nearly double that speed, taking just 2 minutes and 7 seconds on average, or 2.8 ppm. The device was extremely slow at printing in color, turning in one of the slowest times to date on our six-page PDF of mixed text and color graphics: The TS3320 took 4 minutes (1.5 ppm) to print the document. This was significantly slower than the category average of 33.5 seconds, or 9 ppm. The TS3320 printed our five-page text document in 43.7 seconds (or 6.9 pages per minute ). Lacking a duplexer and ADF, this unit is quite lightweight, at eight-and-a-half pounds. With the trays extended, the TS3320 becomes 21.8 inches deep and 8.4 inches tall. With the paper trays retracted, it measures 17.2 inches wide by 12.5 inches deep it's 5.8 inches tall. The TS3320 is neither compact nor extremely large for an inkjet all-in-one.